Misinformation is wrong or false information. It can be spread accidentally, perhaps the person doesn’t realise the information was wrong, or it can be spread intentionally to mislead and/or manipulate others (disinformation). Here, the term misinformation is about wrong or false information whether it was spread accidentally or intentionally.
The spread of health misinformation is a significant risk for global public health through its negative effects on health-related behaviours. Misinformation can increase vaccine hesitancy and decrease vaccination rates, leaving people susceptible to disease with their associated risks and disease outbreaks in our communities.
Misinformation is not new. Its spread was increasing with the rise of social media before the COVID-19 disease pandemic. A review of true and false stories shared on Twitter from 2006–2017 showed that true news was rarely shared with more than 1,000 people, but false news routinely spread to 1,000–100,000 people.
However, arrival of the pandemic contributed to a global surge in the spread of misinformation. During the pandemic, the volume of information (infodemic), confusion, heightened human emotions such as fear and anxiety, mistrust, the ability of social media to spread false information rapidly and widely, and apply algorithms that created echo chambers.
The surge and rapid dissemination of misinformation means it is essential that vaccine communications employ the most effective techniques first time, every time. Debunking is one of these, provision of correct information can be done by experts and non-experts ‘on-the-spot’.
Image by Verified
Improve community knowledge about how misinformation spreads and how to recognise the tactics used by those deliberately spreading to manipulate the audience into reading more and believing the misinformation. Encourage people to ‘Pause before you share’, reduce accidental spread of misinformation.
If we can predict what misinformation may be about circulate, we can get a head start and prime the audience by delivering factual, easy to understand information. The opportunity to pre-empt (prebunk) misinformation can make it harder for misinformation to get support.
Once misinformation is circulating, we need to take every opportunity to rebut it. Debunking (exposing the sham, taking the nonsense out) has been shown to have a positive impact on the intent to receive vaccines.
While the credibility of the and trustworthiness of the corrector is important, experts and non-experts can provide effective social correction (correction of misinformation on social media) when they rebut with factual information. On social media, it may be as simple as posting the correct information in a reply to the misinformation. But if the misinformation being corrected isn’t as obvious, we can follow these best-practice recommendations:
The debunking technique has been challenged in the past with the suggestion that repeating the misinformation during the debunking process backfired by increasing familiarity with it instead. Evidence is mounting against this happening for the vast majority of misinformation recipients, with the exception of a small group of highly vaccine sceptical people.